25102 Lower Springbank Road in Rural Rocky View County: Springbank Detached for sale : MLS®# A2278680

Mountain View County Alberta Homes For Sale

Alberta MLS® Search

Mountain View County Alberta Information

Mountain View County is a municipal district in Division No. 6 in central Alberta, Canada. Located between the cities of Calgary and Red Deer within the Calgary-Edmonton corridor, its municipal office is located north of the Town of Didsbury. Mountain View County is a member of the Rural Municipalities of Alberta, along with numerous local boards, commissions and committees. The first government surveys of the area between Calgary and Edmonton were not made until 1883, around the time when the Canadian Pacific Railway arrived from Eastern Canada in Calgary, then just a small settlement. Just to the east of where the busy Queen Elizabeth II highway runs today, people and goods travelled between Calgary and Fort Edmonton by wagon along the original Calgary and Edmonton Trail. In 1890, the Calgary and Edmonton Railway was chartered, and construction began, with the line reaching the area now comprising the county by the end of that year. While a handful of squatters had arrived pre-1890, settlement in the area did not begin in earnest until the arrival of the C & E Railway. On July 27, 1891, the first through train made the trip from Calgary to Strathcona, marking the beginning of regular scheduled passenger train service for the next 60 years. The operation of Calgary & Edmonton Railway passed to the Canadian Pacific Railway, which continues to operate the line as its main Calgary-Edmonton connection. After 1891, homesteaders began to arrive in the region from across Europe and North America, with settlements sprouting up around the fourth (Carstairs), fifth (Didsbury) and sixth (Olds) sidings. Settlement in the early days was typified by ethnic and usually religious groups living in close-knit communities or colonies. Notable among them were a group of Mennonite families who homesteaded in the Didsbury area from Europe via Ontario around the turn of the 19th century. A large number of German settlers from the American Midwest also settled around Olds; and a group of Norwegian pioneers blazed a trail westward towards Sundre and Bergen. As the population grew, so did their needs. This led to the formation of local government, though the creation of local Improvement Districts. These were relatively small administrative units, generally no bigger than 72 square miles (190 km2) in size, and were responsible for a number of limited duties including setting local tax rates, and keeping track of necessary local improvements. In December 1911 the Alberta government brought forward new legislation designed to introduce greater self-government into rural areas of the province. Specifically, the Municipal Act of 1912 encouraged local improvement districts to consolidate with one another to form larger rural municipalities. Initially the response to the idea of consolidation was unenthusiastic. A majority of rural residents in Mountain View voted against consolidation with other L.I.D.’s in a series of plebiscites held in 1912. Only the Rural Municipality of Mountain View No. 310 would be created out of four improvement districts around Olds and Didsbury, making it one of 55 rural municipalities to come into existence province-wide on December 9, 1912. While Mountain View was the first to consolidate, others would soon follow their lead. The Municipal District of Mountain View No. 49 was formed into the County of Mountain View No. 17 as of January 1, 1961, with William J. Bagnall of Dogpound was selected as the county’s first reeve. A municipal councillor prior to the county’s formation, Bagnall would continue to serve as reeve until 1980. The newly formed county chose Didsbury as the location of its municipal office, and in October 1962, a new administration building was opened to house both the county administration and the school board. This building would serve the county until a new state-of-the-art office was built in 2005, near the Olds-Didsbury Airport along Highway 2A. On January 21, 1998, the County of Mountain View No. 17 officially changed its name to Mountain View County, as it continues to be known today. The following urban municipalities are surrounded by Mountain View County.[3] The following hamlets are located within Mountain View County.[3] The following localities are located within Mountain View County.[4] In 2008, Mountain View County established 20 districts as rural neighbourhoods.[citation needed] In the 2021 Census of Population conducted by Statistics Canada, Mountain View County had a population of 12,981 living in 5,014 of its 5,743 total private dwellings, a change of -0.7% from its 2016 population of 13,074. With a land area of 3,763.42 km2 (1,453.06 sq mi), it had a population density of 3.4/km2 (8.9/sq mi) in 2021.[2] In the 2016 Census of Population conducted by Statistics Canada, Mountain View County had a population of 13,074 living in 5,025 of its 5,666 total private dwellings, a 5.8% change from its 2011 population of 12,359. With a land area of 3,782.64 km2 (1,460.49 sq mi), it had a population density of 3.5/km2 (9.0/sq mi) in 2016.[5] Oil and gas is the main economic driver of Mountain View County, along with agriculture, forestry and tourism. In the early 1890s the first schools began to organize in the area now comprising Mountain View County. By 1930, almost 90 school districts had been created to serve the region, with the one-room school house remaining a fixture of rural life until 1936, when the Social Credit government allowed for the creation of larger school divisions. As consolidation of rural municipalities continued throughput the 1940s and 50s, the provincial government moved to amalgamate municipalities and the local school boards. In 1955, the M.D. of Mountain View and Olds School Division No. 39 were made “coterminous” (meaning they shared the same boundaries). With the introduction of the County system of government in 1961, joint administration of municipalities and the school boards was initiated, and would continue until 1994. Olds School Division No. 39 would eventually evolve into the Chinook’s Edge School Division, which continues to serve the county. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_View_County

Mountain View County Alberta Homes MLS®

Welcome to our Mountain View County Alberta Homes MLS® Search page, where you can explore a diverse selection of Homes MLS® listings.

www.FarmForSale.ca is produced by Steve LeBlanc, an experienced Farm and Commercial Realtor®, The search pre-set includes Homes listings within a 100 km radius of Mountain View County Alberta, each listing provides detailed insights into the Mountain View County Alberta area.

Whether looking for Farms, Ranch, Land, Commercial or Residential, you will find valuable information about the local community, amenities, and market trends. Our advanced search filters allow you to easily refine your search by location, property type, price range, and more, while interactive maps help you visualize property locations and explore surrounding areas.

Each listing includes comprehensive details, high-quality photos, and key features to assist you in making informed decisions. Additionally, Steve LeBlanc offers insights into the Mountain View County Alberta area real estate market, community highlights, and essential amenities, helping you understand each property’s unique characteristics.

Steve LeBlanc’s years of experience in Farm and Commercial real estate ensure you receive knowledgeable and personalized assistance throughout your buying or selling journey.

Welcome to www.FarmForSale.ca

Steve LeBlanc

Maps | Data | Information

Visit Market Update For More

Topsoil Depth (in) Alberta Source aafc slc version 3.2

Understanding Topsoil Depth in Alberta: Insights from AAFC SLC Version 3.2 Data

Topsoil depth is a critical factor for agricultural productivity, influencing water retention, nutrient availability, and root growth. The provided map of Alberta illustrates the topsoil depth in inches, highlighting significant regional variations. This analysis is based on data from the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) Soil Landscapes of Canada (SLC) Version 3.2.

Key Observations

The topsoil depth in Western Alberta and the Rockies is generally shallow, ranging from 0 to 6 inches. This is due to the rugged terrain and erosional processes associated with mountainous regions. The shallow topsoil in these areas supports forests and natural vegetation rather than extensive agriculture.

Central Alberta, including areas around Edmonton and Red Deer, exhibits moderate to deep topsoil depths, generally between 8 to 14 inches. These depths are conducive to productive agriculture, supporting a variety of crops. The deeper topsoil in central regions contributes to higher agricultural yields and sustainable farming practices.

In Southern and Eastern Alberta, regions such as Calgary and areas towards the Saskatchewan border show variable topsoil depths ranging from 6 to 10 inches. While suitable for agriculture, these areas may require careful soil management to maintain productivity. Areas with shallower topsoil are more drought-resistant and may need irrigation and soil conservation practices.

Regional Analysis

The Rocky Mountain Influence is evident in the shallow topsoil of the Rocky Mountain foothills, resulting from the rocky and rugged terrain, limiting soil accumulation. These areas are more suited to forest growth and natural vegetation rather than intensive agriculture.

In contrast, the Prairie Conditions in central Alberta benefit from moderate to deep topsoil, which is ideal for crop production and supports Alberta’s agricultural economy. Maintaining topsoil depth through conservation practices is essential for sustaining long-term agrarian productivity in these areas.

Implications for Agriculture

Understanding topsoil depth is crucial for effective soil management practices, including crop selection, irrigation, and fertilization. Farmers can use this data to optimize their farming practices, choosing crops suited to the available topsoil depth and implementing appropriate soil conservation measures. Deeper topsoil improves water retention and nutrient availability, which is essential for healthy crop growth and high yields.

Conclusion

The topsoil depth map of Alberta reveals significant regional variations influenced by geographical features such as the Rocky Mountains and the fertile plains of central Alberta. Understanding these variations is crucial for optimizing agricultural practices and ensuring sustainable farming. By leveraging this data, farmers can improve crop yields, manage soil health, and enhance overall agrarian productivity in Alberta.

Sources

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) Soil Landscapes of Canada (SLC) Version 3.2 Data
Alberta Agriculture and Forestry

Saskatchewan Rm’s SCIC Average Soil Rating

Soil Class Average for Each RM in Saskatchewan: A-P Rating System

The map showing the soil class average for each Rural Municipality (RM) in Saskatchewan uses the A-P rating system, where A represents the best soil quality and P represents the lowest. This classification helps understand the agricultural potential and soil health across the province.

Key Features of the Map

A-P Rating System:

A Rating: Soils with the highest agricultural productivity potential. These soils are rich in nutrients, have good structure, and have excellent moisture retention.

P Rating: Soils with the lowest agricultural productivity potential. These may have poor fertility, high salinity, or drainage issues.

Geographical Distribution:

The map highlights the variability in soil quality across Saskatchewan. Areas with higher ratings (A, B, C) are often more suitable for intensive agriculture.

Agricultural Zones: High-quality soils predominantly support major agricultural activities in the central and southern regions of the province.

Implications for Agriculture:

Crop Selection: Farmers can use this information to select appropriate crops for their land, ensuring optimal yields.

Soil Management: Identifying lower-quality soils (rated P, O, N) can help implement targeted soil improvement practices.

Applications of the Soil Class Map

Agricultural Planning:

Optimizing Crop Yields: Farmers can determine the best areas for different types of crops based on soil quality. High-rated soils (A, B) can support more demanding crops.

Sustainable Practices: Implementing crop rotation, cover cropping, and conservation tillage can help maintain soil health.

Land Management:

Resource Allocation: Land managers can allocate resources more effectively by focusing efforts on areas with high agricultural potential.

Policy Development: Policymakers can use the map to develop strategies for soil conservation and sustainable agricultural practices.

Conclusion

Using the A-P rating system, the soil class average map for each RM in Saskatchewan is a valuable tool for farmers, land managers, and policymakers. It provides essential insights into soil quality, helping to enhance agricultural productivity, implement sustainable practices, and conserve environmental resources.

Sources

Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (SCIC)

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC)

Canadian Soil Information Service (CanSIS)

For more detailed information and to view the full map, you can visit the Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (SCIC) and Canadian Soil Information Service (CanSIS).

7 Saskatchewan Rm’s that contain SCIC Soil rating A

Class A Soil in Saskatchewan

Class A soil is considered premium agricultural land, offering optimal conditions for crop production due to its superior fertility, structure, and moisture retention. In Saskatchewan, seven Rural Municipalities (RMs) are renowned for having Class A soil. These regions are pivotal to the province’s agricultural success.

The 7 RMs with Class A Soil in Saskatchewan

Star City (RM 428)

It is known for its rich, loamy soil, which supports a variety of crops, including wheat, canola, and barley.

Flett’s Springs (RM 429)

The fertile soil in this RM is ideal for grain and oilseed crops, which contribute significantly to the local economy.

Invergordon (RM 430)

The Class A soil supports diverse farming operations, including mixed grain farming and livestock production.

St. Louis (RM 431)

This area is known for its productive soil, which is well-suited for high-yield crop farming.

Kinistino (RM 459)

The fertile soil in Kinistino supports a robust agricultural sector, mainly cereal and oilseed production.

Birch Hills (RM 460)

Known for its excellent soil quality, Birch Hills is a prime location for high-value crop production.

Prince Albert (RM 461)

This RM benefits from rich, fertile soil that supports a wide range of agricultural activities, making it a vital area for the province’s farming industry.

Conclusion
The seven RMs in Saskatchewan with Class A soil are crucial to the province’s agricultural success. These regions provide optimal crop growth conditions, contributing significantly to the local economy and supporting sustainable farming practices. Recognizing and preserving the value of Class A soil is essential for the continued prosperity of Saskatchewan’s farming industry.

Sources
Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (SCIC)

CP Rail 1910 Land for sale in Central Alberta

The map titled “CP Rail Lands for Sale 1910 Central Alberta” is a historical document showcasing the lands offered for sale by the Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CPR) in Central Alberta around the year 1910. Here’s a detailed analysis of the historical context, significance, and features of this map:
Historical Context

Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR): Established in the late 19th century, the CPR played a pivotal role in the development and settlement of Western Canada. The railway facilitated transportation, trade, and migration, contributing significantly to the region’s economic growth.
Land Sales: The CPR was granted extensive land holdings by the Canadian government as part of the incentives to build the transcontinental railway. These lands were then sold to settlers, immigrants, and investors to finance railway construction and operations.
Features of the Map
Geographical Coverage: The map covers Central Alberta, indicating the sections of land available for purchase. This region includes a mix of agricultural land and potential settlement areas.
Land Parcels: The red shading on the map indicates the specific parcels of land that were for sale. Each parcel is meticulously plotted, showing the systematic approach to land distribution.
Sectional Grid: The map uses a sectional grid system common in land surveying, dividing the area into manageable units for sale and development. This grid system was essential for organizing the vast tracts of land and making them accessible to buyers.
Transportation Routes: The map highlights major transportation routes, including railways and roads, which were crucial for accessing the land and facilitating movement of goods and people.
Topographical Features: Natural features such as rivers, lakes, and terrain types are marked on the map, providing prospective buyers with important information about the land’s characteristics and suitability for farming or other uses.
Significance
Settlement and Development: The sale of CPR lands was instrumental in populating and developing Central Alberta. It attracted settlers from various parts of Canada and abroad, contributing to the growth of agricultural communities.
Economic Impact: The proceeds from land sales helped finance the construction and expansion of the CPR, which in turn boosted economic activities by connecting remote areas to markets and resources.
Historical Record: Maps like these serve as valuable historical records, offering insights into land use, settlement patterns, and the economic strategies of the early 20th century. They are crucial for understanding the transformation of Western Canada from a frontier region to a developed agricultural and economic hub.
Conclusion
The “CP Rail Lands for Sale 1910 Central Alberta” map is a testament to the strategic role of the Canadian Pacific Railway in shaping the settlement and development of Western Canada. By selling land to settlers, the CPR not only financed its operations but also facilitated the growth of thriving communities in Central Alberta. This historical map provides a glimpse into the land distribution practices and the early development of the region, highlighting the interconnectedness of transportation, land use, and economic growth.
Additional Resources
For further reading and exploration of historical maps and the role of the Canadian Pacific Railway in Canadian history, you can refer to:
Historical Atlas of Canada

1967 Detailed Soil map for Saskatchewan

Saskatchewan Detailed Soil Map from 1967: A Historical Perspective

The Saskatchewan Detailed Soil Map from 1967, created by R. C. McKinnon, L. J. Schappert, and R. R. D. Cumming, is an invaluable resource for understanding the diverse soil types and their distribution across the province. This map, available through the Canadian Soil Information Service (CanSIS) and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), offers detailed insights into the soil landscapes of Saskatchewan.

Key Features of the Map

Soil Classification:

The map categorizes soils into various types, each represented by distinct colors and patterns. These classifications include Brunisolic, Chernozemic, Gleysolic, Luvisolic, Organic, and Solonetzic soils.

Orthic Gray: These soils are predominantly found in the northern forested regions, indicated in blue on the map.

Black and Dark Brown: Fertile soils in agricultural areas are shown in darker shades, crucial for crop production.

Soil Texture and Composition:

Information on soil texture, such as loam, sandy loam, and clay loam, is detailed on the map. This is vital for understanding soil fertility, water retention, and suitability for different crops.

Rough Broken Land: Identified in specific regions, these areas have significant elevation changes and are less suitable for agriculture.

Saline and Solonetzic Soils:

The map marks areas with saline and Solonetzic soils, which pose challenges for agriculture due to high salt content and poor soil structure. These regions require careful management and are highlighted to aid in agricultural planning.

Importance of the Map

Agricultural Planning:

Farmers and agronomists can utilize this map to identify suitable areas for various crops based on soil type and texture, optimizing crop selection, irrigation, and soil conservation practices.

Environmental Conservation:

The map assists in identifying areas that need protection and sustainable management practices to prevent soil degradation and erosion, contributing to environmental conservation efforts.

Historical Reference:

The 1967 soil map provides a historical reference point for soil studies, allowing comparisons with modern data to assess changes in soil health and land use over time.

Conclusion

The 1967 detailed soil map of Saskatchewan remains a crucial tool for anyone involved in agriculture, land management, and environmental conservation. By providing detailed information on soil types, textures, and topographical features, it aids in making informed decisions for sustainable land use and agricultural productivity.

Sources

Saskatchewan Soil Information System

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC)

Open Government Portal

Farm address count per postal code Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba

Farm Count per Postal Code:

Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba
The map illustrates farm density across Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, measured by the number of farms per postal code. This representation helps identify areas with high agricultural activity and regions with fewer farms, highlighting the distribution of farming operations in these provinces. Canada Post is the data source for this map.
Key Features of the Map

Farm Density Representation:

Color Gradient: The map uses a color gradient to show farm density. Darker colors indicate higher farm densities, while lighter colors show lower densities.
Farm Count Range: The farm counts range from 1 to over 600 farms per postal code, with the highest densities in dark red.

Geographical Distribution:

High-Density Areas: Regions with darker colors, indicating higher farm densities, are primarily found in the southern and central parts of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and southern Manitoba.

Low-Density Areas: Northern regions and areas with fewer postal codes show lighter colors, indicating fewer farms.

Data Sources:

Canada Post: Provides the postal code data, ensuring accurate representation of farm distribution.
Agricultural Statistics: Supplementary data from agricultural agencies and Statistics Canada help validate the farm counts.
Applications of the Farm Density Map

Agricultural Planning:

Resource Allocation: The map helps allocate agricultural resources such as seeds, fertilizers, and machinery. Areas with higher farm densities may need more resources and support services.
Infrastructure Development: Identifying high-density farming areas can guide agricultural infrastructure development like roads, storage facilities, and irrigation systems.

Market Analysis:

Supply Chain Optimization: Businesses can use the map to optimize supply chains by identifying regions with high agricultural output, ensuring efficient distribution of goods and services.
Investment Decisions: Investors can use farm density data to identify promising regions for agricultural investments, supporting new ventures and expansions.

Policy Making:

Support Programs: Policymakers can design targeted support programs for farmers based on density, focusing on areas with high farming activity to enhance productivity and sustainability.
Rural Development: The map can inform rural development strategies, ensuring balanced growth and addressing the needs of farming communities.
Conclusion
The farm count per postal code map for Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba is essential for farmers, agronomists, businesses, and policymakers. By providing a clear picture of farm density, it supports informed decision-making in agricultural planning, market analysis, and policy development.
Sources
Canada Post
Statistics Canada
Government of Saskatchewan Agriculture
For more detailed information and access to the complete data, you can visit the Canada Post and Statistics Canada websites.